Review: Doctor Who, The Crimson Horror
May. 12th, 2013 08:38 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Patterns of abuse
![]() |
I know a lot of you enjoyed "The Crimson Horror" and, in comparison to the previous week's travesty, you had every right to.
Nevertheless, what you enjoyed was still pretty lousy television and I guarantee that, unless you make a real study of it, you won't remember a damned thing about it a year from now.
Don't believe me?
As usual, both plot- and fun-spoilers abound, so enter at your own risk.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-13 12:41 pm (UTC)And horses are sentient. The word you want is "sapient". Star Trek IV has a lot to answer for...
Quite right
Date: 2013-05-13 02:14 pm (UTC)Did you like it, then?
And horses are sentient. The word you want is "sapient". Star Trek IV has a lot to answer for...
You're right, of course. I dunno if I can lay the blame on Star Trek IV; it's been an awfully long time. Better I just accept that the error is mine.
Re: Quite right
Date: 2013-05-13 03:31 pm (UTC)I tend to blame Star Trek because it seemed to popularise the word. I just looked it up on Wiktionary, and it states there that sci-fi seems to have its own definition!
Re: Quite right
Date: 2013-05-17 11:06 am (UTC)As previously stated, you are entitled to your opinion, but please don't tell others what they should have thought about an episode.
I personally enjoyed it because it was a return to fun, silly, makes-no-sense-at-all, Classic Who.
Constructive criticism is quite acceptable, but this is sailing very close to bashing.
This comm is not a love-fest - granted - but we ask that you don't upset other members with your opinions.
Thank you.
Re: Quite right
Date: 2013-05-17 03:40 pm (UTC)I don't think I was bashing, but I can certainly see why this one was "sailing very close" to it. I'll endeavour to keep further from shore in future.