ed_rex: (ace)
[personal profile] ed_rex posting in [community profile] theoldbluebox

The contempt of the show-runner

The Hisotry of the Time War, screenshot, copyright BBC

An insult. A slap in the face. Or should I say, another insult, another slap in the face?

What more is there to say? The whole of Steven Moffat's Doctor Who has been a long series of insults dressed up as Big Ideas, punctuated by apologies from the likes of Richard Curtis and Neil Gaiman.

But how long can we point to "Vincent and the Doctor" or "The Doctor's Wife" and tell ourselves that Steven Moffat actually cares about the cultural institution in his charge?

The truth is, we have become so used to terrible television that when the merely mediocre happens along, people like me nearly start preaching the second coming.

It's time we face the truth: Steven Moffat holds us, his audience, in utter contempt. Take as Exhibit 37, the latest mess of a program broadcast under the name of Doctor Who.

"Journey to the Centre of the TARDIS" begins with an implausible and arbitrary set-up and is propelled by a plot that works only through the unlikely stupidity of its guest characters, the even more unlikely (and dumb) decisions of its regulars and a resolution that re-uses — yet again! — one of Moffat's now tired and tiresome time-travel tropes — and which then cheats on its own rules. The BBC brain-trust ought to be ashamed to have allowed it to air.

My full review is behind this link, but be warned: I am not happy and sometimes I say so in language unfit for ears of the young and tender, or for eyes of work-mates reading over one's shoulder. Also, there are spoilers, as per normal.

Finally, if you want to suggest that I hate this show so much I shouldn't be reviewing it, you may be right. But I committed myself to seeing Series 7 through to the end, and so I will. But after that? If Steven Moffat is still in charge, I rather suspect I'll be done with the show for the duration. Those of you as sick of my opinions as I am sick of Steven Moffat's stories probably have more reason for hope than I do.

Mod Pops In

Date: 2013-05-05 02:06 am (UTC)
mrs_tribble: (Beans)
From: [personal profile] mrs_tribble
We are all entitled to our opinion - and thank you for being so respectful as to not flame.

I personally enjoyed that episode because it took me back to Classic Who, but this community always invites friendly discussion to compare opinions.

Have at it :)

Re: Mod Pops In

Date: 2013-05-05 10:52 am (UTC)
mrs_tribble: (Angel)
From: [personal profile] mrs_tribble
Well, I might steal your teddy bears (because I can't ever resist the plushy cuteness) but I'm otherwise perfectly harmless :D

I'm a Pertwee baby. Don't remember a lot about him (apart from bumping into him in a pub once) but loved BakerT - just don't get me started on BakerC!

One thing I've always loved about Who is that you can never be sure what you're getting, but if you get cheese it's usually your favourite type.

Although... can we pretend that the pirate episode never happened? Because that was the worst cheese ever with mould on! :)

Re: Mod Pops In

Date: 2013-05-05 07:59 pm (UTC)
mrs_tribble: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mrs_tribble
This is the thing; I knew that the same writer was responsible for the whole pirate debacle and so I was really pleasantly surprised! Of all possible writers that could give me anything close to Classic Who, this is not the writer I was looking for!

Please do feel free to complain about the whole Space Pirate thing! I'm off to read your review and laugh at every single point that I agree with - which I suspect will be pretty much everything you have to say :)

Profile

theoldbluebox: (Default)
The Old Blue Box - a Whoniverse-wide comm

October 2015

S M T W T F S
    123
4 5678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25 262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 17th, 2025 08:43 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios